Betekenis van:
action at law

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. Likewise, under the private-law procedure, the creditors ‘do not recover their right to take individual action’, save in exceptional circumstances, at the end of the compulsory winding-up procedure.
2. In sum, neither the current law nor the results of the investigation justify not to take anti-dumping action on any of the grounds mentioned at the beginning of this section.
3. Issued and blank stolen, lost or misappropriated passports are used to elude law enforcement with the object of carrying out illicit activities capable of jeopardising the security of the Union and of each one of the Member States. Meaningful action can only be taken at Union level by reason of the very nature of the threat. Action by the Member States individually could not achieve the abovementioned objective. This Common Position does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.
4. In Spain, a 1982 Law and a Royal Decree of 1985 discipline the bargaining and the conclusion of standard cultivation contracts between producers’ representatives and processors. The purpose of this overall regulatory framework (to include the action taken by the Agriculture Ministry thereafter) was (until the year 2000) to at least encourage joint negotiations between producers and processors on the cultivation ‘contract prices’.
5. Issued and blank stolen, lost or misappropriated passports are used to elude law enforcement with the object of carrying out illicit activities capable of jeopardising the security of the Union and of each one of the Member States. Meaningful action can only be taken at Union level by reason of the very nature of the threat.
6. As a rule, this information shall be deleted immediately after the related alert has been deleted from the SIS II, and in any event at the latest one year thereafter. However, data relating to a particular alert which a Member State has issued or to an alert in connection with which action has been taken on its territory may be stored for longer in accordance with national law.
7. According to CFF, the Court of Cassation, in the case of Mines et produits chimiques de Salsignes, does not refer at all to the direct liability of the State shareholder in the event of liquidation of the undertaking of which it is the shareholder but rather the possibility of conducting an action for payment of social debts against a public company of an industrial and commercial nature and the fact that it is impossible for their managers to escape from their obligations by relying on action by the public authorities.As regards the non-application to the present case of the case-law of the Court of Appeal of Rouen in the Aspocomp case, CFF submits that the subject-matter of that case-law, relating to an order that a parent company pay to the employees of a subsidiary social benefits for ‘failure to comply with an agreement’ ratified by the former, is very different from the facts of the SNCM file.
8. Commission initiatives such as MEDIA 2007 (Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) [7]) and the Audio Visual Media Service Directive (Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities [8]) which aim at reinforcing the competitiveness of European audiovisual and content industry, would contribute to media literacy.
9. According to CFF, the Court of Cassation, in the case of Mines et produits chimiques de Salsignes, does not refer at all to the direct liability of the State shareholder in the event of liquidation of the undertaking of which it is the shareholder but rather the possibility of conducting an action for payment of social debts against a public company of an industrial and commercial nature and the fact that it is impossible for their managers to escape from their obligations by relying on action by the public authorities.As regards the non-application to the present case of the case-law of the Court of Appeal of Rouen in the Aspocomp case, CFF submits that the subject-matter of that case-law, relating to an order that a parent company pay to the employees of a subsidiary social benefits for ‘failure to comply with an agreement’ ratified by the former, is very different from the facts of the SNCM file. There is therefore no definite risk that CGMF or the State will be ordered to pay the redundancy payments in the event of compulsory liquidation. However, CFF doubts the estimated figure for the other social costs on account of the fact that they seem to differ depending on the experts asked to provide them.
10. require managers of the issuers and of the holders of shares or other financial instruments, or of persons or entities referred to in Articles 10 or 13, to notify the information required under this Directive, or under national law adopted in accordance with this Directive, and, if necessary, to provide further information and documents; (d) suspend, or request the relevant regulated market to suspend, trading in securities for a maximum of ten days at a time if it has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the provisions of this Directive, or of national law adopted in accordance with this Directive, have been infringed by the issuer; (e) prohibit trading on a regulated market if it finds that the provisions of this Directive, or of national law adopted in accordance with this Directive, have been infringed, or if it has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the provisions of this Directive have been infringed; (f) monitor that the issuer discloses timely information with the objective of ensuring effective and equal access to the public in all Member States where the securities are traded and take appropriate action if that is not the case;