Betekenis van:
adverse opinion

adverse opinion
Zelfstandig naamwoord
    • an opinion concerning financial statements (usually based on an audit by a CPA) that the statements as a whole do not present results fairly or are not in conformity with the generally accepted accounting practices of the United States

    Hyperoniemen


    Voorbeeldzinnen

    1. This adverse opinion is based on … [5].
    2. Indicate the reason(s) for the adverse opinion for each body and on each aspect.
    3. The measures taken by Germany were not sufficient, in Talkline's opinion, to offset the aid's adverse effects.
    4. From the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) of 3 March 2009 [2] it results that guanidinoacetic acid (CAS No 352-97-6) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health and the environment.
    5. The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 8 March 2006 that Bacillus subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment [3].
    6. According to that opinion, the use of that preparation does not have an adverse effect on this additional animal category and it is efficacious in improving weight gain, feed intake and feed utilisation.
    7. The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 9 December 2005 that benzoic acid (VevoVitall) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment [2].
    8. In this scientific opinion the EFSA considered it unlikely that adverse effects of PFOS and PFOA are occurring in the general population, but noted uncertainties with regards to developmental effects in living organisms.
    9. The opinion adopted on 12 March 2008 (published 26 March 2008) [2] by the European Food Safety Authority (hereafter EFSA), concluded, from all evidence provided, that cut flowers of the genetically modified carnation ( Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 123.8.12) are unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed ornamental use.
    10. The opinion adopted on 17 May 2006 (published 27 June 2006) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), concluded, from all evidence provided, that cut flowers of the genetically modified carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L., line 123.2.38) are unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed ornamental use.
    11. The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 19 September 2007 that the microorganism preparation Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012 (Toyocerin) does not have an adverse effect on consumers, users or the environment [6].
    12. The opinion adopted on 8 June 2005 by the European Food Safety Authority, concluded, from all evidence provided, that MON 863 × MON 810 is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed use.
    13. The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 2 and 7 July 2009 [2] that the enzyme preparation of serine protease produced by Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 19670) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment and that the use of that preparation can improve the performance of the animals.
    14. From the Opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) of 16 July 2008 [2] it results that, on the basis of the data provided by the manufacturer, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 (Ecobiol and Ecobiol plus) does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment and that it is efficacious in stabilising the gut flora.
    15. In its opinion of 29 March 2006 [9], EFSA concluded that there is no reason to believe that the continued placing on the market of T25 maize is likely to cause any adverse effects for human and animal health or the environment under the conditions of its consent.