Betekenis van:
dividing line

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. The dividing line for the application ratione temporis of the 1996 and 2002 Notices has been drawn in point 28 of the 2002 Notice, which reads as follows:
2. Defining the threshold for the product concerned above B20 allowed to draw a clear dividing line and avoided confusion between the products, the markets and the various parties in the USA.
3. The parties did not bring any evidence showing that the threshold fixed in the provisional Regulation to set the dividing line between product concerned and product non concerned was artificial.
4. However, when comparing this footwear type with the product concerned, a clear dividing line could not be drawn with regard to the basic physical and technical characteristics and uses of this type of footwear and the product concerned.
5. Furthermore, it was found that ‘hiking’ shoes are widely produced in the Community and that a clear dividing line between the imported ‘hiking shoes’ and Community production could not be drawn.
6. Rather, it was found that the conclusions drawn in the two preceding recitals also apply in the case of those types of footwear, i.e. there is no clear dividing line and there is direct competition between those and the remaining types of footwear.
7. Spot settlement date: the date on which a spot transaction in a financial instrument is settled in accordance with prevailing market conventions for that financial instrument. Straight-line depreciation/amortisation: depreciation/amortisation over a given period is determined by dividing the cost of the asset, less its estimated residual value, by the estimated useful life of the asset pro rata temporis.
8. However, those claims were deemed insufficient to exclude children's footwear from the definition of the product concerned because they were not substantiated with sufficient evidence showing that in this investigation a clear dividing line could be drawn between children's footwear and other footwear types within the scope of the investigation.
9. The investigation however revealed that the conclusions with respect to STAF did not apply to footwear not having the STAF characteristics. Rather, it was found that the conclusions drawn in the two preceding recitals also apply in the case of those types of footwear, i.e. there is no clear dividing line and there is direct competition between those and the remaining types of footwear.