Betekenis van:
group discussion
group discussion
Zelfstandig naamwoord
- gesprek tussen mensen in een groep
- a discussion among participants who have an agreed (serious) topic
Synoniemen
Hyperoniemen
Hyponiemen
group discussion
Zelfstandig naamwoord
- jaarvergadering
- a discussion among participants who have an agreed (serious) topic
Synoniemen
Hyperoniemen
Hyponiemen
Voorbeeldzinnen
- The group will decide on the items to be included on the agenda for discussion.
- The programme should determine the subjects for discussion by the group or one of its sub-groups and set out a time-table for discussion of draft reports in the plenary meeting of the group.
- The Commission shall draw up a summary of those reports for discussion within the competent Working Group of the Committee.
- It is therefore recommended that, ideally, advice be sought from expert colleagues, possibly in the form of a group discussion, before concluding a risk assessment.
- The Commission shall set out a work programme for each calendar year. The programme should determine the subjects for discussion by the group or one of its sub-groups and set out a time-table for discussion of draft reports in the plenary meeting of the group.
- The working group or Secretary-General shall subsequently, in accordance with the first sentence of Rule 36(4), submit documents for discussion together with a recommendation for a decision.
- The group shall be a forum for discussion, consultation and follow-up. It shall work under the authority of the Association Committee, to which it shall report after each meeting.
- Summary minutes on the discussion on each point on the agenda and the opinions delivered by the group are drafted by the secretariat under the responsibility of the Chair.
- The budget group shall examine the draft before the Bureau discussion and, where appropriate, make remarks or propose modifications. The Bureau shall draw up the estimates of the expenditure and revenue of the Committee.
- The Commission’s representative chairing the group may ask experts with specific competence on a subject on the agenda to participate in the group’s or sub-group’s discussion if this is useful and/or necessary.
- These groups, of perhaps 3 to 5 members, should include a combination of expertise appropriate to the product under assessment: engineers, chemists, (micro-)biologists, statisticians, product safety managers, and others. Group discussion will be particularly useful when a product is new on the market and has never been assessed before.