Betekenis van:
previous question

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. no clinical, pathological or serological evidence of Aujeszky’s disease has been recorded in the previous 12 months in the holding in question;
2. For example, the name of a previous employer, names and addresses of family members, details of a vehicle or property which the person in question might own.
3. no clinical, pathological or serological evidence of Aujeszky’s disease has been recorded in the previous 12 months in the holding of origin of the pigs in question;
4. If an indent referred to in the previous paragraphs is the first indent in the point in question, it shall be preceded by the words ‘, as amended by:’.
5. In previous decisions [10] the Commission has found that the market economy investor principle is respected in the case of public capital injections where the firm in question is a healthy firm.
6. no evidence of classical swine fever has been recorded in the previous 12 months in the holding in question and the holding is located outside a protection or surveillance zone;
7. Farms or mollusc farming areas which health status in the previous period was, in accordance with Part A of Annex III to Directive 2006/88/EC, category I, category II, category III or category IV and have at least one positive animal in this period.In the case of programmes submitted before 1 August 2008, Farms or mollusc farming areas which were not positive to the disease in question in the previous period and have at least one positive animal in this period.
8. Farms or mollusc farming areas which health status in the previous period was, in accordance with Part A of Annex III to Directive 2006/88/EC, category I, category II, category III or category IV and have at least one positive animal in this period.In the case of programmes submitted before 1 August 2008, Farms or mollusc farming areas which were not positive to the disease in question in the previous period and have at least one positive animal in this period.
9. In its letter of 1 October 2002 Germany stated that if, in the face of all previous arguments, the Commission were to regard Kahla II as a company in difficulty, the aid measures in question should be assessed as restructuring aid on the basis of the Community guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [20] (restructuring aid guidelines).
10. Such intervention should be aimed at a fair redistribution of routes and frequencies between the accepting carriers on the basis of the volumes of traffic on the routes (and packages of routes) in question, ascertained for each of them over the previous two years. The minimum frequency, timetables and capacity to be offered for each route are specified under point ‘2.
11. without prejudice to paragraph 3(b), the choice of the Member State as to the intensity of controls to be carried out shall be made taking account in particular of the degree of contamination of the country of origin, the characteristics of the products in question, the results of the previous checks and the export certificates referred to in Article 3;
12. for three consecutive years on a self-employed basis or as a manager of an undertaking, where the beneficiary proves that he has received previous training of at least three years for the activity in question, evidenced by a certificate recognised by the Member State or judged by a competent professional body to be fully valid; or
13. Where a previous or subsequent incapacity for work was caused by an accident which occurred when the person concerned was subject to the legislation of a Member State which makes no distinction according to the origin of the incapacity to work, the competent institution or the body designated by the competent authority of the Member State in question shall:
14. Concerning this last argument, the Commission notes first of all that it is a new argument which contradicts the previous position of the French authorities, which had submitted estimates on 15 May 2003, as confirmed and supplemented on 29 January 2004. Moreover, the French authorities did not question the accuracy of these estimates at any time during the course of the procedure.
15. As to the question of whether SORENI is a firm eligible for restructuring aid, France argues that SORENI, although being a new legal entity, constitutes in fact a continuation of the previous ship-repair activities and should therefore be eligible for restructuring aid.