Betekenis van:
scoop

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • eerste openbaarmaking
  • a news report that is reported first by one news organization
"he got a scoop on the bribery of city officials"

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • primeur, eersteling
  • a large ladle
"he used a scoop to serve the ice cream"

Hyperoniemen

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • scoop
  • a news report that is reported first by one news organization
"he got a scoop on the bribery of city officials"

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • schepspade
  • the shovel or bucket of a dredge or backhoe

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • hoosvat, schepvat
  • the shovel or bucket of a dredge or backhoe

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

scoop
Zelfstandig naamwoord
    • the quantity a scoop will hold

    Synoniemen

    Hyperoniemen

    scoop
    Zelfstandig naamwoord
      • a hollow concave shape made by removing something

      Synoniemen

      Hyperoniemen

      scoop
      Zelfstandig naamwoord
        • street names for gamma hydroxybutyrate

        Synoniemen

        Hyperoniemen

        to scoop
        Werkwoord
        • uitlichten
        • take out or up with or as if with a scoop
        "scoop the sugar out of the container"

        Synoniemen

        Hyperoniemen

        Hyponiemen

        to scoop
        Werkwoord
          • get the better of

          Synoniemen

          Hyperoniemen

          Hyponiemen


          Voorbeeldzinnen

          1. What's the scoop on your new boyfriend?
          2. If you walk your dog, scoop the poop.
          3. A dietary exposure assessment was performed in the SCOOP-task 3.2.11.
          4. Report available on the Commission's website (DG Health and Consumer Protection) at http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/scoop/task3210.pdf
          5. In the framework of Directive 93/5/EEC, a specific SCOOP-task ‘Collection of occurrence data on PAH in food’ has been performed in 2004 [37].
          6. Report available on the website of the European Commission, DG Health and Consumer Protection (http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/scoop/task3210.pdf).
          7. In 2001, a SCOOP-task ‘Assessment of the dietary intake of patulin by the population of EU Member States’ in the framework of Directive 93/5/EEC was performed [11].
          8. Reports on tasks for scientific cooperation, Task 3.2.10 ‘Collection of occurrence data of Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU Member States’. http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/scoop/task3210.pdf
          9. Taking into account the outcome of the SCOOP-task 3.2.11, EFSA concluded that the levels of mercury found in foods, other than fish and seafood, were of lower concern.
          10. In the framework of Directive 93/5/EEC 2004 the SCOOP-task 3.2.11 ‘Assessment of the dietary exposure to arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury of the population of the EU Member States’ was performed in 2004 [23].
          11. As regards the other trichothecenes considered in the abovementioned SCOOP-Task, such as 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, fusarenon-X, T2-triol, diacetoxyscirpenol, neosolaniol, monoacetoxyscirpenol and verrucol, as far as the information is available all dietary intakes are low.
          12. In the framework of Directive 93/5/EEC the SCOOP-task ‘Collection and collation of data on levels of 3-MCPD and related substances in foodstuffs’ was performed and finalised in June 2004 [30].
          13. In the framework of Directive 93/5/EEC the SCOOP-task ‘Collection of occurrence data on Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU Member States’ was performed and finalised in September 2003 [20].
          14. Exposure estimates taking into account the SCOOP-task ‘Assessment of dietary intake of dioxins and related PCBs by the population of EU Member States’ finalised in June 2000 [33] indicate that a considerable proportion of the Community population has a dietary intake in excess of the TWI.
          15. A dietary exposure assessment was performed in the SCOOP-task 3.2.11. In view of this assessment and the opinion delivered by the SCF, it is appropriate to take measures to reduce the presence of cadmium in food as much as possible.