Betekenis van:
dome

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. According to Mojo and Music Dome, the profit-sharing mechanism did not remove the operator’s advantage.
2. Further submissions from Mojo and Music Dome were received on 14 September 2007 and 5 October 2007.
3. From 2013/2014, in that scenario, the rent paid by Ahoy Management NV would be higher than the rent calculated by the complainants Mojo and Music Dome.
4. In addition, the turnover of an event could easily differ from expectations. The Dutch authorities therefore rejected the view put forward by Mojo and Music Dome.
5. Mojo and Music Dome referred to Annex 3 to the lease (years 2003/2004 and 2004/2005) and provided an overview for the period 2003/2004–2007/2008.
6. With regard to the argument put forward by Mojo and Music Dome here, the Commission cannot exclude the possibility that in its decision to invest in the project the municipality did not behave as a profit-maximising private investor.
7. According to Mojo and Music Dome, the municipality will receive nothing if the investment does not generate additional income: it will recover its investment only if extra income is indeed generated.
8. The Dutch authorities specifically reaffirmed that, contrary to the views of Mojo and Music Dome, there was indeed a trend in the year-to-year turnover of Ahoy Rotterdam NV.
9. As regards the price of shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV and the rent for the Ahoy complex, Mojo and Music Dome argued that the conflict of interest faced by the management and prospective buyer when it submitted the information to Deloitte had resulted in a valuation of the shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV that was too low.
10. Both before and after the formal investigation was initiated Mojo and Music Dome argued that the results of the Deloitte reports were vitiated because Deloitte had applied the wrong methodology and because it had used biased information provided by the management; the Commission finds that these arguments have not been properly substantiated.
11. Mojo and Music Dome further contend that some of the results actually achieved by Ahoy Rotterdam NV differ from the results forecast in Deloitte’s valuation of the shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV [23], and that if these forecasts were to be updated the result of the valuation, and thus the price for the shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV, would be significantly higher.
12. Mojo and Music Dome argued that the planned investment conferred an advantage on the operator of the complex, in particular because the expansion of the capacity of the Ahoy Arena would increase the operator’s revenues. Even if the operator’s revenues did not increase, the improvement of the facilities would still confer a competitive advantage on Ahoy Rotterdam NV, as it would have the benefit of an improvement in the facilities free of charge, whereas any private undertaking would have had to pay the cost itself.