Betekenis van:
freeing
freeing
Zelfstandig naamwoord
- het bevrijd worden; het verlossen
- the act of liberating someone or something
Synoniemen
Hyperoniemen
Hyponiemen
freeing
Zelfstandig naamwoord
- het vrijlaten uit gevangenschap
- the act of liberating someone or something
Synoniemen
Hyperoniemen
Hyponiemen
freeing
Zelfstandig naamwoord
- release
- the act of liberating someone or something
Synoniemen
Hyperoniemen
Hyponiemen
Werkwoord
Voorbeeldzinnen
- Regarding the positive externalities related to the freeing-up of the frequency spectrum, these advantages arise mainly from the switch-off of the analogue terrestrial platform.
- visual inspection of the head and, after freeing the tongue, the throat; palpation and, if necessary, incision of the sub-maxillary, retropharyngeal and parotid lymph nodes (Lnn retropharyngiales, mandibulares and parotidei).
- Moreover, according to the Impaired Assets Communication, reference can be made to the freeing of regulatory capital generated thanks to the measure for the purpose of evaluating the remuneration for the FSA measure.
- By freeing up the portion of diamonds from ALROSA previously resold by De Beers and, upon lapse of the transitional period, by discontinuing the entirety of De Beers’ purchase relationship with ALROSA, the commitments address the concern of reducing access to a viable source of alternative supply of rough diamonds and hindering the second biggest competitor from fully competing with De Beers.
- Regarding the positive externalities related to the freeing-up of the frequency spectrum, these advantages arise mainly from the switch-off of the analogue terrestrial platform. This fact has not been put in question in the case of North Rhine-Westphalia.
- visual inspection of the head and, after freeing the tongue, the throat; palpation and, if necessary, incision of the sub-maxillary, retropharyngeal and parotid lymph nodes (Lnn retropharyngiales, mandibulares and parotidei). The tongue must be freed to permit a detailed visual inspection of the mouth and the fauces and must itself be visually examined and palpated.
- The Commission therefore considers it necessary to impose conditions which (i) will enable Sernam to continue moving through innovative diversification towards a market segment to be developed (and therefore without overcapacity) and (ii) will make it possible to replace Sernam’s services by services of other operators (which will have the effect of freeing up Sernam’s market shares in these segments) in market segments with overcapacity or stagnation or in decline.
- Thus, the State’s contribution can be deemed to be in line with recent case-law in this area, and in particular with the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Combus [11] according to which freeing a public-sector company from structural disadvantages as compared to its private-sector competitors, such as those due to the ‘privileged and costly status of officials’, does not constitute State aid.
- The Commission takes a positive view of the fact that the first tranche of USD 4,5 billion, which must be reimbursed in cash by Dexia, exceeds the level of expected losses, at 31 January 2009, in both the baseline scenario and the stress scenario, as this reduces the risk borne by the Belgian and French States. More specifically, the Commission views positively the level of remuneration granted to the Belgian and French States for the FSA measure, compared with the level of the residual risk assumed by the Belgian and French States. Moreover, according to the Impaired Assets Communication, reference can be made to the freeing of regulatory capital generated thanks to the measure for the purpose of evaluating the remuneration for the FSA measure.
- The analysis conducted in the light of Article 87(3)(c) has identified two potential market failures specific to the digital switch-over of the terrestrial broadcasting platform: coordination problems between the different market players in achieving a smooth switch-over process and positive externalities associated with the freeing-up of frequency spectrum. While these market failures may, in principle, justify a departure from the principle of technological neutrality, they cannot serve as justification for the aid granted in the present case. Accordingly, the Commission is not convinced that the aid is an appropriate, necessary and proportionate instrument to remedy a market failure and to promote the roll-out of DVB-T. Even if account is taken of the fact that the amount of aid is relatively low in absolute terms and that the distortion of competition at broadcasting level is rather limited, the aid amounts, in case of some channels, to close to half of the transmission costs and may have influenced the choice of broadcasters in favour of the DVB-T platform, thereby causing a more important distortion of competition at network level.