Betekenis van:
entertain

to entertain
Werkwoord
  • gevoelens hebben
  • maintain (a theory, thoughts, or feelings)
"entertain interesting notions"

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

to entertain
Werkwoord
  • verkering hebben
  • take into consideration, have in view
"He entertained the notion of moving to South America"

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

to entertain
Werkwoord
    • provide entertainment for

    Hyperoniemen

    Hyponiemen


    Voorbeeldzinnen

    1. My cat is very anxious to entertain me.
    2. They gave a play to entertain their teachers.
    3. I will entertain your suggestion, if you can refer me to a style guide that dictates a comma in this case.
    4. The Commission has examined whether the exceptional circumstances alleged by the Terni companies in paragraph (47) could have led them to entertain such legitimate expectations.
    5. In the light of the above considerations, the Commission has concluded that there are no extraordinary circumstances which could have led the Terni companies to entertain legitimate expectations as to the lawfulness of the contested measure.
    6. The Commission has examined whether the exceptional circumstances alleged by Alcoa, which are linked to the existence of the Alumix decision, may have led it to entertain such legitimate expectations.
    7. According to settled case law the right to rely on the principle of protection of legitimate expectation extends to any individual who is in a situation in which it is clear that the Community authorities have, by giving him precise assurances, led him to entertain legitimate expectations.
    8. the court which, according to its own law, has jurisdiction to entertain proceedings concerning the status of a person if the matter relating to maintenance is ancillary to those proceedings, unless that jurisdiction is based solely on the nationality of one of the parties, or
    9. For the purposes of this Directive, the definition of an audiovisual media service should cover mass media in their function to inform, entertain and educate the general public, and should include audiovisual commercial communication but should exclude any form of private correspondence, such as e-mails sent to a limited number of recipients.
    10. Hungary refers to the case law which has consistently held that ‘the right to rely on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations extends to any person in a situation where a Community authority has caused him to entertain expectations which are justified.’
    11. However, case law has consistently held that in view of the mandatory nature of the supervision of State aid by the Commission under Article 108 of the Treaty, undertakings to which aid has been granted may not, in principle, entertain a legitimate expectation that the aid is lawful unless it has been granted in compliance with the procedure laid down in that Article.
    12. Moreover, in view of the mandatory nature of the supervision of State aid by the Authority under Protocol 3 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, undertakings to which aid has been granted cannot, in principle, entertain a legitimate expectation that the aid is lawful unless it has been granted in compliance with the procedure laid down in the provisions of that Protocol [83].
    13. a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which is under the editorial responsibility of a media service provider and the principal purpose of which is the provision of programmes, in order to inform, entertain or educate, to the general public by electronic communications networks within the meaning of point (a) of Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
    14. The Commission has examined whether the exceptional circumstances alleged by Alcoa, which are linked to the existence of the Alumix decision, may have led it to entertain such legitimate expectations. (266) The Court has consistently held that legitimate expectations can arise from only precise, unconditional and concordant assurances, given by the Community institutions, of such a nature as to give rise to a justified expectation that the measure was not aid or was lawful [123].
    15. In particular, as to legitimate expectations, the Court of Justice stated that: ‘in view of the mandatory nature of the supervision of State aid by the Commission under Article 87 of the Treaty, undertakings to which an aid has been granted cannot, in principle, entertain a legitimate expectation that the aid is lawful unless it has been granted in compliance with the procedure laid down in that Article.